3 contact hours · 0.3 AOTA CEUs · Module 6 — follow along, take notes, and complete the reflection prompts.
Module 6
Anchor concept
You now have observation, referral, and modification. What you do not yet have is a repeatable structure for deciding what to look at, in what order, and how to defend the plan.
Follow along
Key ideas
Notes
Reference figures
Which level each block of this course was operating on
Module 1 — Vision as a gateway system
Frames the whole system; every level is introduced.
Module 2 — Visual pathways (ventral / dorsal)
Magnocellular/dorsal work shows at Level 2 efficiency; parvocellular/ventral identification is Level 3 processing.
Module 3 — Underlying Conditions vs. Functional Limitations
Ocular and neurological conditions act on the sensory foundation and on binocular efficiency; OT treats the functional limitation, not the diagnosis.
Module 4 — Comorbidity patterns
Autism, ADHD, dyslexia, dysgraphia signatures appear as processing and visual-motor integration performance.
Module 5 — Low-vision service model
Low vision is a Level 1 sensory-foundation problem. Contrast, lighting, and magnification restore access at the floor; the Level 5 change is the downstream result, not the target.
Module 6 — Where this goes next
Functional integration is where all findings resolve into a plan of care.
Apply it
Take the student you have had in mind through this course. Write the referral-or-not decision in one sentence, the modification you will make in one sentence, and the observable indicator you will watch in one sentence. Would a colleague reading only those three sentences know what you saw and why you acted?
Practice
In one sentence, state what a structured, level-based organization of visual performance would give you that your current observation notes do not.
Take it to work
Before your next treatment day, put one modification from Module 5 in place for one student and record the single observation you will use to judge whether it helped.